Chlorodehydromethyltestosterone vs Testosterone Propionate
A side-by-side research comparison of Chlorodehydromethyltestosterone and Testosterone Propionate across mechanism, dosing, half-life, benefits, side effects and research status.
Comparison table
| Attribute | Chlorodehydromethyltestosterone | Testosterone Propionate |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Chlorodehydromethyltestosterone (Turinabol / Tbol) | Testosterone Propionate (Short-Ester Testosterone) |
| Category | Anabolic Steroids | Anabolic Steroids |
| Status | Not medically approved (controlled substance) | Prescription drug (controlled substance) |
| Mechanism | A structural blend of Dianabol and clostebol, this 17aa oral does not aromatize, so it produces dry, lean gains without estrogenic water retention. It has moderate anabolic and low androgenic activity. | Testosterone bound to a small propionate ester, giving rapid release and a short half-life. It acts on androgen receptors identically to other testosterone forms but with faster onset and offset of blood levels. |
| Molecular weight | 334.9 Da | 344.5 Da |
| Half-life | ~16 hours | ~0.8-2 days |
| Bioavailability | Oral | Intramuscular/subcutaneous injection |
| Typical dose | Lean-gain cycles (non-medical) | Variable; frequent dosing required |
| Frequency | Daily | Every 1-2 days |
| Route | Oral tablet | Intramuscular or subcutaneous injection |
Chlorodehydromethyltestosterone reported benefits
- Lean, dry gains
- No water retention
- No aromatization
- Smoother than Dianabol
- Strength gains
Testosterone Propionate reported benefits
- Rapid onset of testosterone levels
- Fast clearance (flexible timing)
- Muscle mass and strength
- Less water retention than long esters (perceived)
Related comparisons
Research and educational reference only. Not medical advice.