ResearchSafe

KLOW vs GLOW stack, what actually changed for me running them back to back

Posted by nomad_brandon in Protocols & Stacks - 1 points, 0 comments.

So for what it is worth i ran the GLOW stack first for about 8 weeks, then switched over to KLOW and added KPV, and the difference was honestly noticeable to me, not overnight but over the first few weeks the inflammation piece seemed to dial back more than GLOW alone. I was running GHK-Cu 200mcg, BPC 500mcg daily, and TB-500 2.5mg twice a week on GLOW, and on KLOW i kept the same three and added KPV 500mcg daily, subcutaneous. Recon was the usual bacteriostatic water math, 2ml vial on the TB-500 side and 1ml on the smaller peptides, nothing fancy.

The skin tightening from GHK-Cu was already kicking in on GLOW by week 3 or so, but adding KPV seemed to take the swelling down around an old knee surgery site i have. Could just be placebo, could be the NF-kB thing, i am not gonna pretend i know the mechanism from the inside. For anyone who has run both, did KPV actually do something for you or did it feel like an extra injection for not much, that is the part i am still on the fence about.

Community discussion - research and educational context only. Not medical advice.